THE AUDIT BOARD OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA’S OPINION: BETWEEN REGIONAL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND PUBLIC WELFARE (THE STUDY ON REGENCIES AND CITIES IN RIAU PROVINCE)

Authors

  • Golden Victor Vica Roy Saragih BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Riau
  • Arby Novrika Hasibuan BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v6i2.466

Keywords:

Public welfare, financial performance, BPK’s opinion

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the influence of local government financial performance on public welfare with the opinion of The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK) as mediation. This study was quantitative using panel data of 12 regencies and cities in Riau Province. The secondary data used was local government financial performance data, public welfare data, and the opinion from BPK Riau Representative from 2014 to 2018. The data analysis tool used for the hypothesis testing was path analysis with the SEM-PLS approach. The result shows that local government financial performance has been positively and significantly correlated to the public welfare in the regencies and cities in Riau Province, but not significant to the BPK’s opinion. Besides, the BPK’s opinion also does not correlate to public welfare. These findings indicate that the opinion of BPK has not been able to verify the correlation between the local government's financial performance and public welfare. Thus, it cannot be a benchmark in predicting the public welfare level.

 

 

Author Biographies

Golden Victor Vica Roy Saragih, BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Riau

Subauditorat Riau 1

Arby Novrika Hasibuan, BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Riau

Subauditorat Riau 1

References

Akbar, B., & Djazuli, A. (2015). Audit keuangan dan kesejahteraan rakyat studi pada Kabupaten Badung, Tabanan dan Kota Denpasar Tahun 2013. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 1(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i1.9

Akbar, Y. R. (2020). Analisis kuantitatif, pengolahan data statistik menggunakan SPSS & pengumpulan data survei Google Form/Survey Monkey. Purwokerto: CV Pena Persada.

Akbar, Y. R., & Mar'aini. (2020). Implementasi sistem informasi pengelolaan keuangan daerah dengan pendekatan model penerimaan teknologi terhadap kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Riau. Bilancia: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 4(1), 92-101.

Astuti, Y. D., & Adrison, V. (2019). The audit board of Indonesia's opinion and bribery in local governments in Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 5(2), 125-138. DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v5i2.379

Badrudin, R. (2015). Evaluation of the specific allocation fund for Indonesian society welfare. International Journal of Applied Business and Economics 13(7), 5607-5624.

Bastian, I. (2006). Akuntansi sektor publik : Suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

BPK RI. (2016). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester (IHPS) I Tahun 2016 (Summary of Semester Audit Results I Year 2016). Retrieved from htps://www.bpk.go.id/ihps.

BPK RI. (2017). BPK Regulation Number 1 Year 2017 concerning State Financial Audit Standards (Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara). Retrieved from http://www. spkn. bpk. go. id.

BPK RI. (2017). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester (IHPS) I Tahun 2017 (Summary of Semester Audit Results I Year 2017). Retrieved from htps://www.bpk.go.id/ihps.

BPK RI. (2018). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester (IHPS) I Tahun 2018 (Summary of Semester Audit Results I Year 2018). Retrieved from htps://www.bpk.go.id/ihps.

Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public management review, 6(1), 21-53. DOI: 10.1080/14719030410001675722

Ferdinand, A. (2012). Structural equation modeling dalam penelitian manajemen aplikasi model-model rumit dalam penelitian untuk Tesis magister dan desertasi doktor. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponegoro.

Fornell, C. R., & Lacker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1)39-50. DOI: 10.2307/ 3151312

Ghozali, I. (2014). Partial least square. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 58 of 2005 concerning Regional Financial Management as amended by Government
Regulation Number 12 of 2019 (Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah yang diubah dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2019). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/103888/pp-no-12-tahun-2019.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson. (2008). Multivariate data analysis (5th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.

Halachmi, A. (2005). Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 5(4), 502-516. DOI: 10.1108/17410400510622197

Halim, A. (2004). Manajemen keuangan daerah. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Halim, A., & Damayanti, T. (2007). Pengelolaan keuangan daerah. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Halim, A. (2013). Akuntansi keuangan daerah: akuntansi sektor publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jogiyanto, & Abdillah, W. (2012). Konsep dan aplikasi PLS (Partial Least Square) untuk penelitian empiris. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.

Kluvers, R. (2003). Accountability for performance in local government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(1), 57-69. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.00314

Kluvers, R., & Tippett, J. (2010). Mechanisms of accountability in local government: an exploratory study. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(7), 46. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v5n7p46

Kusuma, M. W., & Badrudin, R. (2016). Fiscal decentralization effect on economic growth in Bali. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 8(1), 136-147. DOI: 10.20885/ejem.vol8. iss2.art6

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2004 concerning State Financial Management and Accountability Audit (Undang- Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2004. Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/40509/uu-no-15-tahun-2004.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2006 concerning The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia. (Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.). Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/40184/uu-no-15-tahun-2006.

Mangkunegara, I. (2015). Pengaruh karakteristik keuangan dan hasil pemeriksaan pada kesejahteraan masyarakat di Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 1(2), 141-155. DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v1i2.24

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi sektor publik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI.

Marfiana, N., & Kurniasih, L. (2013). Pengaruh karakteristik pemerintah daerah dan hasil pemeriksaan audit BPK terhadap kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah kabupaten/kota. Journal & Proceeding FEB UNSOED, 3(1).

Masdiantini, P. R., & Erawati, N. M. (2016). Pengaruh ukuran pemerintah daerah, kemakmuran, intergovermental revenue, temuan dan opini audit BPK pada kinerja keuangan. Jurnal Akuntasi Universitas Udayana 14(2), 1150-1182.

Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 21 of 2011 concerning second amendment from Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 13 of 2006 (Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan kedua dari Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 13 Tahun 2006). Retrieved from https://www.kemendagri.go.id/arsip/detail/6564/pedoman-pengelolaan-keuangan-daerah.

Mulyadi, P. (2014). Auditing dan pemeriksaan akuntansi. (Edisi Pertama). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Musahadah, & Amarullah, R. (2018). Unqualified opinion and public welfare : A paradox. Borneo Administrator, 14 (2), 135-150. DOI: 10.24258/jba.v14i2.335

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Putro, H. P. H., Furqan, A., & Brilliyanti, A. (2019). The position of stakeholders involved in the collaboration of the tourism destination governance in Pangandaran, West Java-Indonesia. Journal of Management Info, 6(1), 22-26. DOI: 10.31580/jmi.v6i1.488

Putry, N. A., & Badrudin, R. (2017). Pengaruh kinerja keuangan daerah terhadap opini audit dan kesejahteraan masyarakat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis, 12(1), 25-34.

Rozy, M. A., & Wijayanti, P. (2014). The influence of the audit opinion, the original area of revenue, and the equalization fund to regional financial performance. Jurnal Akuntasi Indonesia, 3(2), 81-100. DOI: 10.30659/jai.3.2.81-100

Siregar, S. R. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pertimbangan opini auditor atas laporan keuangan pemerintah Daerah Istemawa Yogyakarta. Accounting Analysis Journal, 1 (2), 1-8. DOI: 10.15294/aaj.v1i2.554

Statistics Indonesia. (2000). Statistical yearbook of Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2001/05/15/e243f32294d3de6068a7d3e3/statistik-indonesia-2000.html.

Sumarjo, H. (2010). Pengaruh karakteristik pemerintah daerah terhadap kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah. Retrieved from https://eprints.uns.ac.id/4060/

Suryaningsih, N. N., Utama, M. S., & Yasa, I. M. (2015). Dampak kinerja keuangan daerah terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 4(08), 537-554.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2006). Economic development. (9th Ed.). New York: Pearson Addison Wesley.

Wei, D. H., Qin, Z. Y, & Tang, S. Q. (2010). Research on the relation between the efficiency of government audit and the security of financial fund: Some evidence from the data of national yearbook. Auditing Research, 3, 9-14.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-28

How to Cite

Saragih, G. V. V. R., & Hasibuan, A. N. (2020). THE AUDIT BOARD OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA’S OPINION: BETWEEN REGIONAL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND PUBLIC WELFARE (THE STUDY ON REGENCIES AND CITIES IN RIAU PROVINCE). Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 6(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v6i2.466